River nature tourist path
Alessa Ciraulo Unsplash

HUMANITA

Project overview

Human-Nature Interactions and Impacts of Tourist Activities on Protected Areas

Tourism in protected areas is a sensitive issue. It is sometimes hard to find the right balance between preserving these and opening them up to visitors. The HUMANITA project developed evidence-based and participatory management tools that allow regions to better monitor and evaluate the impact of tourism in protected areas. The partnership involved tourists and local communities in the development of their solutions, which helped to collect data, create more awareness and change behaviour.

2,36m €

Project Budget

80%

of the Budget is funded by ERDF

Layer 1

5

Countries

9

Regions

10

Partners

5

Pilots

Duration

Start date

End date

Project progress

100%

About the project

HUMANITA addressed the growing impact of tourism and recreational activities on protected areas by improving the understanding and management of human–nature interactions. Bringing together 11 partners from Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Italy and Slovakia, supported by 14 associated partners, the project developed and tested innovative approaches to monitor tourism impacts on nature. HUMANITA supported protected area managers in balancing visitor use with conservation and involved local communities and tourists in participatory monitoring. Key results include a transnational monitoring strategy, five pilot actions, monitoring solutions, local action plans, Citizen Science tools, training materials and policy recommendations for biodiversity protection and sustainable visitor management.

Project partnership

Project partners

Slovensko (SK)

Lead partner

University of Žilina

Department of Geotechnics
Address
Univerzitná 8215/1
01026 Žilina
Country
Slovakia (SK)
Web
https://www.uniza.sk/index.php/en/

Project partner

Institute for Regional Development
Address
Viale Druso 1
39100 Bolzano
Country
Italy (IT)
Web
https://www.eurac.edu/en
Total partner budget
267,606 €
Address
Via Università 12
43121 Parma
Country
Italy (IT)
Web
www.unipr.it
Total partner budget
301,807 €
Address
Horvaćanska 174
10000 Zagreb
Country
Croatia (HR)
Web
www.notitia.hr
Total partner budget
213,620 €
Engineering & IT
Address
Europastraße 4
9524 Villach
Country
Austria (AT)
Web
https://www.fh-kaernten.at//
Total partner budget
307,240 €
Address
Hauptplatz 7
9135 Bad Eisenkappel/Železna Kapla
Country
Austria (AT)
Web
https://www.geopark-karawanken.at/
Total partner budget
214,000 €
Address
Széher 40
1021 Budapest
Country
Hungary (HU)
Web
https://www.ceeweb.org/
Total partner budget
137,550 €
Project department
Address
Selo 120
52100 Pula
Country
Croatia (HR)
Web
www.kamenjak.hr
Total partner budget
176,643 €
Address
Via Comunale 23
54013  Sassalbo di Fivizzano (MS) 
Country
Italy (IT)
Web
http://www.parcoappennino.it/index.php
Total partner budget
204,763 €
Department of Project Management
Address
Sánc utca 6
3300 Eger
Country
Hungary (HU)
Web
https://www.bnpi.hu/en/hirek
Total partner budget
134,568 €

Roadmap

1

Challenge

With a growing number of visitors and visitor activities, protected areas (PA) in Central Europe (CE) experience an increase in human-nature conflicts. Recreational activities like hiking, mountain biking, or skiing, lead to various environmental impacts on physical and hydrological processes, as well as on ecology and wildlife.

2

Key project message

A key project message was the importance of better managing visitors today so that tomorrow’s visitors can also experience quality sites, their conservation values, and the livelihood and well-being of local communities are supported as well.

3

Approach

HUMANITA focused on the joint development of new complementary tools and methods of tourists’ impact assessment based on transnational exchanges of experiences to better evaluate environmental conditions and trends, take explicit managerial responses and actions, and develop information for national and EU policymakers, and the public. The project aimed to assist PA managers in evidence-based and participatory management (still insufficiently present in practice), helping them put the right measures in the right places, make smarter decisions, prevent negative impacts and human-nature conflicts, and reduce risk using an incremental approach.

4

Joint preparation of 5 pilot actions

Site-specific analyses at 5 pilot sites outline tourism impact-related problems to be addressed in pilot actions. Partners developed a common transnational monitoring strategy and selected monitoring indicators for each pilot site taking into account their policies' relevance; analytical soundness; measurability, and practical usage, with a focus on comparability among countries and jointly developed solutions.

5

Solutions

Partners together developed and tested innovative complementary monitoring methods at pilot sites to refine and deepen their ability to detect environmental/biotic/abiotic variables utilized in monitoring, including both, instrumental and methodological approaches. Jointly developed solutions assess the impact value of different types of tourist activities on nature, and therefore provide information for the detection of changes and trends in the condition of the environment, using artificial intelligence to evaluate mutual relationships and correlations from datasets for predictions.

6

Participatory monitoring

The involvement of tourists and local communities in project activities, including participatory monitoring not only produced new valuable data but also brought awareness-raising, trust-building, and behavioral change. For individuals, this was learning activity, when they can critically analyze the world around them and identify practical actions to protect the environment.

7

Five local action plans

For each pilot site, an action plan was developed to monitor human impacts, further engage local people and tourists in monitoring and nature protection, and properly manage human-nature conflicts while respecting the local context and legal framework.

8

Transnational recommendations

Partners reflected existing narratives and together created new ones for the development of the ‘common heritage’ narrative and its ability to support policymaking. Jointly developed project outputs and final recommendations were shared among relevant stakeholders, and policy makers through accompanying communication activities.

News

Events

Pilot actions

Outputs

Transnational monitoring strategy

The jointly developed transnational monitoring strategy provides a common framework for understanding and monitoring how tourism affects protected natural areas. It was prepared by HUMANITA partners as a practical planning document for protected area managers, based on good-practice examples, pilot-site needs and a shared biodiversity monitoring workflow.

The strategy helps managers define why is monitoring is needed, what should be monitored, where and when, who should be involved and which resources are required

It focuses on five key monitoring areas:

  • Visitor movement and behaviour
  • Vegetation pressure
  • Trail erosion
  • Wildlife disturbance
  • Pollution

The strategy also supports the selection of meaningful and comparable indicators, combining traditional field methods with innovative tools such as visitor counters, digital movement data, camera-based monitoring, acoustic sensors, remote sensing, surveys and citizen participation.

In practice, it can be used to design or improve monitoring programmes, identify tourism pressure hotspots, involve visitors and local communities in data collection, support local action plans, provide evidence for better visitor management and nature protection measures andInform future policy recommendations

Type of output: Strategies and action plans

Solutions assessing the impact value of different types of tourist activities on nature

The jointly developed solutions help protected area managers assess how tourism and recreational activities affect ecosystems and site conditions. They combine a monitoring catalogue with an online toolbox of tested methods for tracking visitor activity and environmental impacts. The catalogue presents eight selected monitoring methods, while the online toolbox offers 22 tested methods and instruments covering areas such as visitor flows, trail erosion, vegetation pressure, wildlife health and pollution. A step-by-step planning approach helps users define objectives, select indicators and choose suitable methods, supporting site-specific monitoring, identification of tourism pressure hotspots, better visitor management and evidence-based protection of sensitive natural areas.
Type of output: Solutions

Local action plans to monitor and resolve human-nature conflicts in pilot sites

The local action plans developed through HUMANITA provide practical, site-specific guidance for reducing conflicts between tourism and nature protection in five pilot protected areas. Based on monitoring results and local knowledge, the plans identify key pressures such as trail erosion, vegetation damage, wildlife disturbance, pollution and visitor pressure on sensitive areas. Each plan outlines concrete actions to improve monitoring, visitor guidance, infrastructure, stakeholder cooperation and community involvement. Some also include zoning approaches to help manage recreational activities more effectively. Together, the five action plans support protected area managers in turning monitoring evidence into practical decisions that strengthen biodiversity protection and promote more sustainable visitor management.
Type of output: Strategies and action plans

HUMANITA

The project lead partner is responsible for the content of this project website.

Project on social media

Project contact

Dana Sitanyiova