Header Image

Self-assess your project proposal

Find out in what shape your project proposal is with our self-assessment tool for applicants.

Self-assessment tool

Are you already quite advanced with developing your project proposal? Then it is probably time to request an individual consultation with us. But before you do so, we recommend to double-check if your application is really sound and relevant. Make use of this tool to find out!

Relevance (Strategic criteria)

1

Is your project proposal relevant for achieving the targeted programme specific objective and the expected result at territorial level? Is the importance and added value of transnational cooperation for the topic clearly addressed demonstrated?

Intervention logic and transnationality

Read more about the programme specific objectives in the programme manual - chapter I.2 Programme Priorities and Structure

2

Is the project intervention logic (i.e. project specific objectives, outputs and expected results) clearly defined and consistent?

Intervention logic and transnationality

Read more about the intervention logic in the programme manual - chapter I.3 Key Project Characteristics

3

Is the project proposal relevant for the common territorial challenges, joint assets and needs of the programme area, and in particular for the specific situation of the participating regions?

Policy and territorial relevance, horizontal principles

Read more about territorial relevance in the programme manual - chapter I.3 Key Project Characteristics

4

Does the project proposal clearly contribute to the relevant policy framework at different levels?

Policy and territorial relevance, horizontal principles

Read more about the policy framework in the programme manual - chapter I.4 Framework of Rules

5

Does the proposal contribute to all horizontal principles (i.e. equal opportunities and non-discrimination, gender equality, sustainable development including environment protection) and integrate them in the project design?

Policy and territorial relevance, horizontal principles

Read more about the horizontal principles in the programme manual - chapter I.4 Framework of Rules

6

Is the innovativeness of your project proposal clearly demonstrated? Does it go beyond existing practices in the sector or participating regions? Is the project proposal building on available knowledge and making use of synergies with other projects or initiatives?

Innovativeness and synergies

Read more about innovativeness in the programme manual - chapter I.3 Key Project Characteristics

Partnership (Strategic criteria)

7

Does your lead applicant have sufficient experience and capacity to manage a transnational cooperation project? Or, is there a clear plan to acquire missing competences through e.g. additional staff or sub-contracting? Do all partners have a clear role and matching competences to fulfil their tasks? In case of partners outside the programme area, is the added value of their participation duly justified?

Partnership composition and competences

Read more about the transnational partnership in the programme manual - chapter I.3 Key Project Characteristics

8

Does your partnership reflect the transnational cooperation dimension and is it geographically balanced? Are partners actively involved in the joint implementation of activities?

Partnership composition and competences

Read more about the transnational partnership in the programme manual - chapter I.3 Key Project Characteristics

9

Does the partnership reflect the transnational cooperation dimension and is it geographically balanced? Are partners actively involved for a joint implementation of activities?

Transnational cooperation approach

More about the transnational partnership can be found in the programme manual - chapter I.3 Key Project Characteristics

Implementation (Operational criteria)

10

Is your methodology suitable to obtain the planned outputs and results? Are the work plan and timing of activities, deliverables and outputs realistic, consistent and transparent? In case of investments, are they clearly relevant for reaching the project objectives? Do they have a clear transnational and pilot character?

Methodology and work plan

Read more about methodology aspects and the work plan in the programme manual - chapter II.2 Drafting and Submitting a Project Proposal

11

Are communication activities planned in the work plan and are they relevant for achieving your communication objectives? Will target groups (and other stakeholders including associated partners) be actively involved in the planned project activities?

Methodology and work plan

Read more about communications in the programme manual - chapter II.2 Drafting and Submitting a Project Proposal

12

Does your project proposal clearly conceptualise the ownership and durability, long lasting effects, and transferability of outputs and results?

Methodology and work plan

Read more about sustainability in the programme manual - chapter II.2 Drafting and Submitting a Project Proposal

13

Does your management approach show a good potential to secure a sound project management, coordination and risk mitigation?

Methodology and work plan

Read more about project management in the programme manual - chapter II.2 Drafting and Submitting a Project Proposal

14

Does your total budget demonstrate value for money? Is there coherence between project design and budget? Are the financial contributions of the partners balanced and do they reflect partner responsibilities?

Budget

Read more about budget and framework rules in the programme manual - chapter I.4 Framework of Rules

This looks promising! Your project proposal seems to meet the main strategic and operational criteria. If you want more guidance, check out our support measures and maybe get in touch for an individual consultation with us.

Sorry, it seems you are not yet ready to submit. Your project proposal shows shortcomings and we recommend to further read into our programme manual and application documents for guidance and information. You can also get in touch with your national contact point.